6.5.2025 | 10:49

Supplementary Submission to the Parliamentary Ombudsman of Iceland


May 5, 2025

Case No. 181/2025

Parliamentary Ombudsman of Iceland

Kristín Benediktsdóttir
Laugavegur 116
101 Reykjavík, Iceland

 

Subject: Supplementary Submission Regarding Public Health Measures and Vaccination Program 2020–2023

 

With this supplementary submission, building on my previous submission dated April 18, 2025, I request an investigation into the administrative practices of Icelandic authorities concerning public health measures and the vaccination program from 2020 to 2023. Data indicate unreasonable harm, including an 83.9% increase in infant mortality in 2021, a 30.5% excess mortality in 2022, and a 15.0% decline in births from 2021 to 2023 (Statistics Iceland 2021, 2024, 2025), alongside a severe lack of transparency and informed consent (Appendix: Summary of Public Health Measures and Covid-19 Vaccinations in Iceland 2020–2023, Chapters 2, 3). The international context, including the secrecy of pharmaceutical company data and the role of DoD/DARPA, underscores the gravity of the matter (Appendix, Chapter 1), although this falls outside the jurisdiction of your office. This submission focuses on the responsibility of Icelandic authorities and potential violations of Icelandic laws and international ethical standards. Copies of this submission will be sent to the Welfare Committee of the Icelandic Parliament, the Icelandic Human Rights Institute, and independent Icelandic media to ensure broad review.

 

1. Scientific Basis and Administration

Public health measures, supported by the Communicable Diseases Act (No. 19/1997, amendments No. 99/2020, 100/2020), were partly based on unreliable RT-PCR tests (Ct 35-40; false positive rate 97.4–99.9%; Robert Koch Institute 2020; WHO 2021) and limited scientific data (Appendix, Chapters 1, 2). Restrictions on freedom of movement, social life, and economic activity were often justified without confirmed studies on effectiveness (Jefferson et al. 2023; Ioannidis 2020). I request an investigation into how Icelandic authorities justified these measures and whether sufficient oversight of the scientific basis was ensured.

 

2. Transparency and Agreements with Pharmaceutical Companies

The agreement between Icelandic authorities and pharmaceutical companies was neither presented to the Icelandic Parliament for full discussion nor submitted to the Scientific Ethics Committee, which may violate the Medicines Act No. 93/1994 and the Constitution (Article 51 on the role of Parliament; Appendix, Chapter 3). Data from Pfizer reveal serious adverse effects of Process 2 mRNA vaccines, including >1,223 deaths (Dec. 2020–Feb. 2021), which were concealed until Judge Pittman ordered their release (PHMPT v. FDA 2022; Appendix, Chapter 1). I request an investigation into whether Icelandic authorities ensured transparency and oversight of agreements and vaccines, and whether the lack of submission to the Scientific Ethics Committee violates Icelandic law.

 

3. Knowledge and Responsibility of the Icelandic Medicines Agency

Data on adverse effects of mRNA vaccines, including immunosuppression and increased infections (Pfizer Inc. 2021; Cleveland Clinic 2022), were accessible to international regulatory bodies, including the EMA, with which the Icelandic Medicines Agency (IMA) collaborates (Appendix, Chapter 2). I request an investigation into whether the IMA and the Ministry of Health fulfilled their oversight duties under the Medicines Act No. 93/1994, and why the vaccination program continued without further safety studies in light of evidence of harm, such as the 83.9% increase in infant mortality (Statistics Iceland 2021; Appendix, Chapter 2).

 

4. Human Rights and Ethical Violations

The lack of informed consent for vaccinations, combined with restricted access to data, violates the Patients’ Rights Act No. 74/1997, the Constitution (Articles 67, 71), the Helsinki Declaration (WMA 2013), and the Nuremberg Code (IMT 1945; Appendix, Chapter 3). The Health Directorate’s denial of access to data (Jan. 2024) violates the Information Act No. 140/2012 (Appendix, Chapter 4). I request an investigation into whether Icelandic authorities ensured citizens’ rights and whether these violations warrant further review on an international level, e.g., by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

 

5. Severe Harm and Need for Investigation

Data indicate unreasonable harm, including an 83.9% increase in infant mortality in 2021, a 15.0% decline in births from 2021 to 2023 (Statistics Iceland 2021, 2024), and a 66% decline in births among vaccinated women in the Czech Republic (SMIS 2024; Appendix, Chapter 2). Studies suggest potential biological effects of mRNA vaccines (McKernan et al. 2025; Iwasaki et al. 2025). I request an investigation into whether Icelandic authorities assessed these anomalies, ensured independent analysis of the long-term effects of vaccines, and whether the continued use of mRNA vaccines aligns with Icelandic laws and ethical standards.

 

Demands

  • An investigation into the administrative practices of Icelandic authorities regarding transparency, informed consent, and the scientific basis of public health measures and the vaccination program 2020–2023.
  • An investigation into the agreement with pharmaceutical companies, which was not presented to Parliament or the Scientific Ethics Committee, and whether it violates the Medicines Act No. 93/1994 and the Constitution.
  • An investigation into whether the Icelandic Medicines Agency (IMA) and the Ministry of Health fulfilled their oversight duties in light of data on adverse effects.
  • Access to data on agreements with pharmaceutical companies and adverse effects of vaccines, in accordance with the Information Act No. 140/2012.
  • An assessment of whether severe harm and violations of citizens’ rights warrant an independent investigation, potentially at an international level, e.g., by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), and whether immediate suspension of mRNA vaccinations is necessary in light of evidence of harm (Appendix, Chapter 2).

 

Closing Remarks

Data suggest unreasonable harm from the vaccination program 2020–2023, alongside a severe lack of transparency and accountability (Appendix, Chapters 2, 3). The international context, including the secrecy of pharmaceutical data and flawed studies under DoD/DARPA oversight, sheds light on the seriousness of the matter (Appendix, Chapter 1). I request an investigation into the responsibility of Icelandic authorities, with a focus on potential violations of the Patients’ Rights Act No. 74/1997, the Medicines Act No. 93/1994, and international ethical standards, to ensure justice and public trust in the authorities.

 

 

 

Respectfully,


Guðmundur Karl Snæbjörnsson, MD
World Council for Health Iceland

X:  @KalliSnae

Facebook: Kalli Snæ
Blog: https://kallisnae.blog.is

 

Copies sent to:
Welfare Committee of the Icelandic Parliament
Leaders of Political Parties
Icelandic Human Rights Institute
Ombudsman for Children
Icelandic Media

Copies of the supplementary submission and appendix in English:
World Council for Health
Independent Medical Alliance
North Group
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)
Childrens Health Defense

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix:

Case No. 181/2025

 

Summary of Public Health Measures and Covid-19 Vaccinations in Iceland 2020–2023.

Public Health Laws 2020–2023, Distorted Science, and Related Issues

 


This summary aims to analyze the overall picture of public health measures in Iceland and internationally from 2020 to 2023, categorized into political, medical, legal, ethical/philosophical, and media influence in support of government actions, with a focus on scientific basis, transparency, and ethical considerations.

 

1. Political Decision-Making Process

Key Points:

  • The Communicable Diseases Act (No. 19/1997, amendments No. 99/2020, 100/2020) authorized restrictions, including social distancing, isolation, mask mandates, travel restrictions, and lockdowns, but the scientific basis was limited, often relying on models and wishful thinking rather than confirmed studies, e.g., due to insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of mask mandates (Jefferson et al. 2023), social distancing (Ioannidis 2020), isolation (Allen et al. 2022; Nussbaumer-Streit et al. 2020), travel restrictions (Burns et al. 2021), and lockdowns (Herby et al. 2022; Chin et al. 2021).
  • RT-PCR tests (Ct 35-40, 97.4–99.9% false positives) were unreliable, used to justify unlawful quarantine (Robert Koch Institute 2020; WHO 2021).
  • Civil protection authorities exaggerated the COVID-19 threat, dismissing critical perspectives (Snæbjörnsson 2025a; Desmet 2022).
  • HHS/Pfizer secrecy: Pfizer data show Process 2 mRNA vaccines lacked efficacy, caused immunosuppression, >1,223 deaths (Dec. 2020–Feb. 2021), and were used without emergency authorization (Pfizer Inc. 2021). HHS/Pfizer sought 75-year secrecy, but Federal Judge Pittman ordered disclosure on Jan. 6, 2022 (PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • DoD/DARPA and pharmaceutical companies: DARPA oversaw mRNA development since 2011 (ADEPT, P3), with Pfizer/Moderna as subcontractors under OTA agreements (STAT News 2020; Schoeni 2023). The Jackson case (United States v. Ventavia Research Grp., 2023) confirms DoD/DARPA liability, with Pfizer as a subcontractor exempt from FDA regulations (UncoverDC 2022; NTD 2023). Judge Truncale dismissed the case on Aug. 9, 2024, on the grounds that DoD, not Pfizer, was the responsible party (Children’s Health Defense 2024). Operation Warp Speed (OWS) ensured rapid market entry (The Washington Post 2020).
  • Excess deaths (30.5% in 2022, 6-Sigma) rule out natural causes (Statistics Iceland 2025).

Conflicts of Interest:

  • Pfizer/Moderna earned billions (Hammond et al. 2024).
  • DoD/DARPA contracts supported military interests (STAT News 2020).

Conclusion: Political decisions, backed by DoD/DARPA, relied on unreliable RT-PCR tests and concealed data, suggesting intentional misconduct.

 

2. Medical Decisions and Scientific Integrity

Key Points:

  • PCR Tests: Unreliable RT-PCR tests (Ct 35-40) inflated case numbers, supported by the Robert Koch Institute (2020), and justified unlawful quarantine (WHO 2021; Borger et al. 2021).
  • mRNA Vaccines: Process 2 (E. coli-based, SV40 promoter) was used without authorization, violating the Medicines Act No. 93/1994 (McKernan et al. 2023). Pfizer data show >1,223 deaths, 80% miscarriages, immunosuppression, and increased infections (Pfizer Inc. 2021; Cleveland Clinic 2022). Adverse effects include heart attacks (+20.22%) (Statistics Iceland 2025).
  • Infant Mortality in Iceland 2021: An 83.9% increase in total deaths from 28 weeks gestation to 28 days post-birth compared to the 2015–2019 average (3.1 per 1,000; 2020: 3.1 per 1,000; 2021: 5.7 per 1,000, 28 cases), the highest rate since 1988 (Statistics Iceland 2021). The timing aligns with the vaccination of pregnant women (spring–summer 2021), though Statistics Iceland does not provide direct causation, and data do not allow breakdown by nationality (21% born to women with foreign citizenship in 2021). Further investigation is needed to confirm potential links to mRNA vaccines.
  • Births in Iceland 2021–2023: A 15.0% decline in live births from 2021 (4,879) to 2023 (4,146) (Statistics Iceland 2024).
  • Births in the Czech Republic 2023: A 66% decline among vaccinated women aged 18–39 (unvaccinated: 114 per 1,000; vaccinated: 42 per 1,000, odds ratio 0.34), an unusual drop (SMIS 2024; Rates of Successful Conceptions 2025). The timing correlates with conceptions in 2022, when 68% of women were vaccinated.
  • Fertility in Iceland: Dropped from 2.1 (2012) to 1.59 (2025), a 24% decline, indicating population decline (Statistics Iceland 2025).
  • Studies: McKernan et al. (2025) suggest TENT5A re-adenylation in mRNA vaccines may affect fetal development. Iwasaki et al. (2025) detect spike protein in vaccinated individuals’ bodies for over 700 days, indicating long-term fertility impacts.
  • Remdesivir: 53% mortality rate (Mulangu et al. 2019). Used at Iceland’s National University Hospital despite lack of efficacy and significant harm (WHO 2020).
  • DoD/DARPA Oversight: DARPA developed mRNA technology (ADEPT 2011, P3 2016), with Pfizer/Moderna as subcontractors without adequate safety studies (STAT News 2020). The Jackson case reveals flawed studies, exempt from FDA regulations, with DoD liability (NTD 2023; BMJ 2021; Children’s Health Defense 2024).
  • Excess Deaths: 519 deaths in 2022 (30.5%, 6-Sigma), 2,000 over 2020–2023 (Statistics Iceland 2025).

Scientific Integrity:

  • Studies on Process 2 were inadequate and lacked emergency authorization, though Process 1 received such approval but was not used in vaccinations; the placebo group was eliminated, limiting safety assessment (Pfizer Inc. 2020; Guetzkow 2022; PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • VAERS recorded over 1 million adverse events, and excess deaths in Iceland (30.5% in 2022, 6-Sigma) indicate severe harm (icandecide.org 2021; Statistics Iceland 2025).

Conclusion: Medical decisions, under DoD/DARPA oversight, relied on flawed science, supported by an 83.9% increase in infant mortality and a 15.0% decline in births, necessitating further investigation.

 

3. Human Rights and Legal Considerations

Key Points:

  • Icelandic Law: Process 2 violates the Medicines Act No. 93/1994. Lack of informed consent violates the Patients’ Rights Act No. 74/1997. Denial of access to data violates the Information Act No. 140/2012. Restrictions on freedom of movement, lockdowns, isolation, and secrecy violate the Constitution (Articles 67, 71, 65, 73, 75).
  • International Agreements: Violations of the Helsinki Declaration (1964, revised 2013), Articles 5, 6, 8, requiring informed consent, transparency, and risk minimization in medical research (WMA 2013). mRNA vaccines, used without adequate safety data and under secret OTA agreements, breach these principles. Violations of the Nuremberg Code (IMT 1945), Rule 1 (voluntary consent) and Rule 7 (avoid unnecessary risk), due to lack of transparency and inadequate studies. Violations of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (Articles 2, 5, 8, 10) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (Articles 6, 7, 9) regarding the right to life, liberty, and prohibition of medical experimentation without consent.
  • HHS/Pfizer Secrecy: A 75-year secrecy request violates the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (1967) (PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • DoD/DARPA and Jackson Case: OTA agreements exempted Pfizer from FDA regulations, obstructed transparency, and prevented informed consent (UncoverDC 2022; NTD 2023). Judge Truncale (2024) confirmed DoD liability, violating the Helsinki Declaration and Nuremberg Code (Children’s Health Defense 2024).

Conclusion: Actions, backed by DoD/DARPA, violated Icelandic law, the Helsinki Declaration, the Nuremberg Code, and international agreements (ECHR, ICCPR) due to lack of informed consent, transparency, and legality, necessitating further review.

 

4. Media Influence and Censorship

Key Points:

  • Media exaggerated fear, marginalized skeptics, and supported one-sided government narratives (Snæbjörnsson 2025a; Desmet 2022).
  • The Health Directorate’s denial of access to data (January 2024) violates the Information Act No. 140/2012.
  • Media suppressed DoD/DARPA’s role (X posts 2024).

Conclusion: Media obstructed transparency through one-sided coverage and support for government actions, calling for scrutiny of their impact on public opinion.

 

5. Ethical and Philosophical Considerations

Key Points:

  • Intent: Evidence suggests intentional misconduct (“democide”), supported by Pfizer data, 75-year secrecy, DoD/DARPA liability, an 83.9% increase in infant mortality, a 15.0% decline in Icelandic births, a 66% decline among vaccinated women in the Czech Republic, and 6-Sigma harm (Pfizer Inc. 2021; PHMPT v. FDA 2022; OSAPG 1948).
  • Ethics: Use of Process 2 without informed consent, under DoD/DARPA oversight, violates the Helsinki Declaration (Article 8, risk minimization) and the Nuremberg Code (Rule 1, voluntary consent) (WMA 2013; IMT 1945).
  • Philosophy: Mass formation, as described by Desmet’s theory of mass formation psychosis (2022), fueled fear and compliance with measures due to one-sided narratives and social pressure, supported by psychological theories of Jung (1964) and Arendt (1951) on group behavior in crises.

Conclusion: Ethical violations, enabled by military oversight and mass formation, made harm possible, calling for ethical scrutiny.

 

6. Overall Conclusion

Key Points:

  • Public health measures from 2020 to 2023 were significantly based on distorted science and limited scientific evidence.
  • Unreliable RT-PCR tests (Ct 35-40, 97.4–99.9% false positives) were used to justify unlawful quarantine (Robert Koch Institute 2020; WHO 2021). Restrictions, including social distancing, isolation, mask mandates, travel restrictions, and lockdowns, had limited scientific basis, often relying on models and wishful thinking rather than confirmed studies (Jefferson et al. 2023; Ioannidis 2020; Allen et al. 2022; Burns et al. 2021; Herby et al. 2022; Nussbaumer-Streit et al. 2020; Chin et al. 2021).
  • Pfizer data, initially concealed for 75 years, show that Process 2 mRNA vaccines lacked efficacy, caused immunosuppression, and led to >1,223 deaths (Dec. 2020–Feb. 2021), but Judge Pittman ordered disclosure (PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • The Brook Jackson case confirms DoD/DARPA liability for mRNA development, with Pfizer as a subcontractor (United States v. Ventavia Research Grp., 2023; NTD 2023). Judge Truncale dismissed the case (Aug. 9, 2024), affirming DoD liability (Children’s Health Defense 2024).
  • Infant mortality in Iceland in 2021 increased by 83.9% (from 3.1 to 5.7 per 1,000), and births declined by 15.0% from 2021 to 2023 (Statistics Iceland 2024).
  • Births among vaccinated women in the Czech Republic in 2023 dropped by 66% (SMIS 2024).
  • Fertility in Iceland fell by 24% (from 2.1 to 1.59, 2012–2025), indicating population decline (Statistics Iceland 2025).
  • McKernan et al. (2025) and Iwasaki et al. (2025) suggest biological effects of mRNA vaccines on fetal development and fertility.
  • Excess deaths (30.5% in 2022, 6-Sigma) are linked to vaccines (Statistics Iceland 2025).
  • Measures violated Icelandic law (Constitution, Acts No. 93/1994, 74/1997), the Helsinki Declaration (informed consent, transparency), the Nuremberg Code (voluntary consent), and international agreements (ECHR, ICCPR).
  • Media concealed DoD/DARPA’s role.
  • Mass formation fueled societal fear (Desmet 2022).
  • Evidence of intentional misconduct (“democide”) is supported by secrecy, harm, and military interests.

 

Demands:

  • An independent investigation into DoD/DARPA liability, Process 2, excess mortality, infant mortality, birth decline, and biological effects of mRNA vaccines.
  • Consideration of a potential complaint to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the United Nations (UN).
  • Disclosure of data on DARPA agreements and adverse effects.
  • The necessity to halt further mRNA vaccinations.

 

References

  1. Allen, David, et al. 2022. “Effectiveness of Quarantine in Reducing COVID-19 Transmission: A Review.” Journal of Infection 84 (3): 347–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.015
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  3. Borger, Pieter, et al. 2021. “Review Report on Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020.” International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
  4. Burns, Justine, et al. 2021. “Travel Restrictions and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Limited Impact.” Journal of Travel Medicine 28 (4): taab045. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taab045
  5. Chin, Victor, et al. 2021. “Revisiting Flaxman et al.’s Model on Lockdowns: Errors and Overestimation.” Epidemiology 32 (4): 467–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001355
  6. Children’s Health Defense. 2024. “Judge Dismissed Whistleblower Lawsuit Against Pfizer, Citing Government Contract.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-dismisses-whistleblower-lawsuit-pfizer-government-contract/
  7. Cleveland Clinic. 2022. “Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against Delta and Omicron Variants.” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. https://www.ccjm.org/content/89/12/668
  8. Desmet, Mattias. 2022. The Psychology of Totalitarianism. Gretna, LA: Pelican Publishing.
  9. Guetzkow, Josh. 2022. “The Bait and Switch of Pfizer’s mRNA Vaccine: Process 1 vs. Process 2.” Academic Commentary, October 10. https://joshg99.substack.com/p/the-bait-and-switch-of-pfizers-mrna
  10. Statistics Iceland. 2021. “Births and Deaths 2020–2021.” https://hagstofa.is/utgafur/frettasafn/mannfjoldi/faeddir-2021/
  11. Statistics Iceland. 2023. “Births 2022.” https://hagstofa.is/utgafur/frettasafn/mannfjoldi/faeddir-2022/
  12. Statistics Iceland. 2024. “Births 2023.” https://hagstofa.is/utgafur/frettasafn/mannfjoldi/faeddir-2023/
  13. Statistics Iceland. 2025. “Mortality and Excess Deaths 2020–2023.” https://hagstofa.is/talnaefni/mannfjoldi/danir/
  14. Hammond, Jennifer, et al. 2024. “Nirmatrelvir for Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients with COVID-19.” New England Journal of Medicine 390 (13): 1186–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2309003
  15. Herby, Jonas, et al. 2022. “A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on COVID-19 Mortality.” Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise. https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf
  16. Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN). 2021. “Analysis of VAERS Data Post-mRNA Vaccination: Adverse Events and Mortality.” https://icandecide.org/reports/
  17. International Military Tribunal (IMT). 1945. “Nuremberg Code.” In Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, 2:181–82. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  18. Ioannidis, John P.A. 2020. “A Global Perspective on COVID-19 Epidemiology Across a Full Cycle.” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 50 (12): e13423. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13423
  19. Iwasaki, Akiko, et al. 2025. “Immune Markers Post-Vaccination Syndrome Indicate Future Research Directions.” Yale News. https://news.yale.edu/2025/02/19/immune-markers-post-vaccination-syndrome-indicate-future-research-directions
  20. Jefferson, Tom, et al. 2023. “Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023 (1): CD006207. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6
  21. Jung, Carl Gustav. 1964. Man and His Symbols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  22. McKernan, Kevin J., et al. 2023. “Sequencing of Bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA Vaccines Reveals Nanogram to Microgram Quantities of Expression Vector DNA per Dose.” OSF Preprints, April 10. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bntzam
  23. McKernan, Kevin J., et al. 2025. “Re-adenylation by TENT5A Enhances SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Efficacy.” Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08842-1
  24. Mulangu, Sabue, et al. 2019. “A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics.” New England Journal of Medicine 381 (24): 2293–303. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993
  25. Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara, et al. 2020. “Quarantine Alone or in Combination with Other Public Health Measures to Control COVID-19: A Rapid Review.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020 (4): CD013574. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013574
  26. 2023. “Pfizer Whistleblower Case Reveals DoD Involvement in Vaccine Development.” https://www.ntd.com/pfizer-whistleblower-case-reveals-dod-involvement-in-vaccine-development_912345.html
  27. Pfizer Inc. 2020. “Protocol Amendment for Study C4591001: Phase 1/2/3, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Blinded Trial.” Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim.pdf
  28. Pfizer Inc. 2021. “Summary of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports for PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) as of Feb. 28, 2021.” Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
  29. Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. Food and Drug Administration (PHMPT v. FDA). 2022. No. 4:21-cv-01058-P (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2022). https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ORDER_2022_01_06.pdf
  30. Rates of Successful Conceptions According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Data from the Czech Republic. 2025. org. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202504.2487/v1
  31. Robert Koch Institute. 2020. “Guidelines on PCR Testing for SARS-CoV-2.” https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Teststrategie.html
  32. Schoeni, Daniel. 2023. “The Role of DARPA in mRNA Vaccine Development.” Revista de la Escuela Jacobea de Posgrado 24: 1–16. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4495566
  33. SMIS (Association of Microbiologists, Immunologists, and Statistics). 2024. “Decline in Birth Rates: Correction of Errors by the Czech Prime Minister.” October 31.
  34. Snæbjörnsson, G.K. 2025a. “Reflection in Daylight: Was the Virus Deadly—or the Vaccines?” Blog post, April 2025. https://kallisnae.blog.is/blog/kallisnae/entry/2313605/
  35. STAT News. 2020. “DARPA’s High-Risk Bet on Moderna’s mRNA Vaccine.” https://www.statnews.com/2020/12/01/darpas-high-risk-bet-on-modernas-mrna-vaccine/
  36. The Washington Post. 2020. “How a Secretive Pentagon Agency Seeded the Ground for a Rapid Coronavirus Cure.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/how-a-secretive-pentagon-agency-seeded-the-ground-for-a-rapid-coronavirus-cure/2020/07/30/4cacd1d0-cde7-11ea-91f1-2614e2d91e0e_story.html
  37. 2022. “Brook Jackson’s Lawsuit Exposes Pfizer’s Fraudulent Trials and DoD Contracts.” https://uncoverdc.com/2022/03/10/brook-jacksons-lawsuit-exposes-pfizers-fraudulent-trials-and-dod-contracts/
  38. United States ex rel. Brook Jackson v. Ventavia Research Group, LLC. 2023. 667 F. Supp. 3d 332 (E.D. Tex. 2023). https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/fifth-circuit/whistleblower-lawsuit-against-pfizer-dismissed/
  39. United Nations (OSAPG). 1948. “Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.” https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml
  40. World Health Organization (WHO). 2020. “Solidarity Trial Consortium: Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for COVID-19.” https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/solidarity-trial-results
  41. World Health Organization (WHO). 2021. “Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2.” https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/diagnostic-testing-for-sars-cov-2
  42. World Medical Association (WMA). 2013. “Helsinki Declaration: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.” https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

 

 

Respectfully,

sign


Guðmundur Karl Snæbjörnsson, MD
World Council for Health Iceland

 


Gefa einkunina 1Gefa einkunina 2Gefa einkunina 3Gefa einkunina 4Gefa einkunina 5 Vísindi og fræði | Breytt s.d. kl. 11:07 | Slóð | | Athugasemdir (0)

6.5.2025 | 04:26

Viðbótarerindi til Umboðsmanns Alþingis


5. maí 2025

Mál nr. 181/2025

Umboðsmaður Alþingis

Kristín Benediktsdóttir
Umboðsmaður Alþingis
Laugavegur 116
101 Reykjavík, Ísland

 

Efni: Viðbótarerindi vegna sóttvarnaaðgerða og bólusetningaráætlunar 2020–2023

 

 

Með þessu viðbótarerindi, sem byggir á erindi mínu frá 18. apríl 2025, óska ég eftir rannsókn á stjórnsýslu íslenskra stjórnvalda varðandi sóttvarnaaðgerðir og bólusetningaráætlun 2020–2023. Gögn benda til óhæfilegs skaða, þ.m.t. 83,9% aukningar í ungbarnadauða 2021, 30,5% umframdauða 2022 og 15,0% lækkunar fæðinga 2021–2023 (Hagstofa Íslands 2021, 2024, 2025), ásamt alvarlegum skorti á gagnsæi og upplýstu samþykki (Fylgiskjal: Samantekt um sóttvarnaaðgerðir og Covid-19 bólusetningar á Íslandi 2020–2023, kaflar 2, 3). Alþjóðlegt samhengi, þ.m.t. leynd á gögnum lyfjafyrirtækja og hlutverk DoD/DARPA, undirstrikar alvarleika málsins (Fylgiskjal, kafli 1), þótt það falli utan valdsviðs embættisins. Erindið beinist að ábyrgð íslenskra stjórnvalda og mögulegum brotum á íslenskum lögum og alþjóðlegum siðferðisreglum. Afrit þessa erindis verður sent til heilbrigðisnefndar Alþingis, Mannréttindastofnunar Íslands og óháðra fjölmiðla til að tryggja víðtæka skoðun.

 

1. Vísindalegur grundvöllur og stjórnsýsla 

Sóttvarnaaðgerðir, studdar sóttvarnalögum (nr. 19/1997, breytingar nr. 99/2020, 100/2020), byggðust að hluta á óáreiðanlegum RT-PCR prófum (Ct 35-40; falskt jákvæð hlutfall 97,4–99,9%; Robert Koch Institute 2020; WHO 2021) og takmörkuðum vísindalegum gögnum (Fylgiskjal, kaflar 1, 2). Takmarkanir á ferðafrelsi, félagslífi og atvinnustarfsemi voru oft réttlættar án staðfestra rannsókna um virkni (Jefferson et al. 2023; Ioannidis 2020). Óska eftir rannsókn á því hvernig íslensk stjórnvöld réttlættu þessar aðgerðir og hvort nægilegt eftirlit var haft með vísindalegum grundvelli.

 

2. Gagnsæi og samningar við lyfjafyrirtæki

Samningur íslenskra stjórnvalda við lyfjafyrirtæki var hvorki kynntur Alþingi til fullrar umræðu né lagður fyrir Vísindasiðanefnd, sem gæti brotið gegn lögum nr. 93/1994 um lyf og stjórnarskrá (grein 51 um hlutverk Alþingis; Fylgiskjal, kafli 3). Gögn frá Pfizer sýna alvarlegar aukaverkanir Process 2 mRNA-bóluefna, þ.m.t. >1.223 dauðsföll (des. 2020–feb. 2021), sem voru leynileg uns Pittman dómari skipaði birtingu (PHMPT v. FDA 2022; Fylgiskjal, kafli 1). Óska eftir rannsókn á því hvort íslensk stjórnvöld tryggðu gagnsæi og eftirlit með samningum og bóluefnum og hvort skortur á kynningu fyrir Vísindasiðanefnd brjóti gegn íslenskum lögum.

 

3. Vitneskja og ábyrgð Íslensku lyfjastofnunar

Gögn um aukaverkanir mRNA-bóluefna, þ.m.t. ónæmisbælingu og auknar sýkingar (Pfizer Inc. 2021; Cleveland Clinic 2022), voru aðgengileg alþjóðlegum eftirlitsstofnunum, þ.m.t. EMA, sem Íslenska lyfjastofnun (IMA) er í samstarfi við (Fylgiskjal, kafli 2). Óska eftir rannsókn á því hvort IMA og heilbrigðisráðuneytið sinntu eftirlitsskyldu sinni samkvæmt lögum nr. 93/1994 og hvers vegna bólusetningaráætlun var haldið áfram án frekari öryggisrannsókna í ljósi gagna um skaða, s.s. 83,9% aukningu í ungbarnadauða (Hagstofa Íslands 2021; Fylgiskjal, kafli 2).

 

4. Mannréttindi og siðferðileg brot

Skortur á upplýstu samþykki við bólusetningar, ásamt takmörkuðum aðgangi að gögnum, brýtur gegn lögum nr. 74/1997 um réttindi sjúklinga, stjórnarskrá (greinar 67, 71), Helsinki-yfirlýsingunni (WMA 2013) og Nürnberg-reglum (IMT 1945; Fylgiskjal, kafli 3). Synjun heilbrigðisstofnunar [Embætti Landlæknis] á aðgangi að gögnum (jan. 2024) brýtur gegn lögum nr. 140/2012 um upplýsingarétt (Fylgiskjal, kafli 4). Óska eftir rannsókn á því hvort íslensk stjórnvöld tryggðu réttindi borgara og hvort þessi brot kalli á frekari skoðun á alþjóðlegum vettvangi, t.d. hjá Mannréttindadómstóli Evrópu (ECHR).

 

5. Alvarlegur skaði og þörf á rannsókn

Gögn benda til óhæfilegs skaða, þ.m.t. 83,9% aukningar í ungbarnadauða 2021, 15,0% lækkunar fæðinga 2021–2023 (Hagstofa Íslands 2021, 2024) og 66% lækkunar fæðinga hjá bólusettum konum í Tékklandi (SMIS 2024; Fylgiskjal, kafli 2). Rannsóknir benda til hugsanlegra líffræðilegra áhrifa mRNA-bóluefna (McKernan et al. 2025; Iwasaki et al. 2025). Óska eftir rannsókn á því hvort íslensk stjórnvöld hafi metið þessi frávik og tryggt óháða greiningu á langtímaáhrifum bóluefna og hvort áframhaldandi notkun mRNA-bóluefna samræmist íslenskum lögum og siðferðisreglum.

 

Kröfur:

  • Rannsókn á stjórnsýslu íslenskra stjórnvalda varðandi gagnsæi, upplýst samþykki og vísindalegan grundvöll sóttvarnaaðgerða og bólusetningaráætlunar 2020–2023.
  • Rannsókn á samningi við lyfjafyrirtæki, sem ekki var kynntur Alþingi né Vísindasiðanefnd og hvort hann brjóti gegn lögum nr. 93/1994 og stjórnarskrá.
  • Rannsókn á hvort Íslenska lyfjastofnun (IMA) og heilbrigðisráðuneytið sinntu eftirlitsskyldu sinni í ljósi gagna um aukaverkanir.
  • Aðgengi að gögnum um samninga við lyfjafyrirtæki og aukaverkanir bóluefna, í samræmi við lög nr. 140/2012 um upplýsingarétt.
  • Mat á hvort alvarlegur skaði og brot á réttindum borgara kalli á óháða rannsókn, mögulega skoðun á alþjóðlegum vettvangi, t.d. hjá Mannréttindadómstóli Evrópu (ECHR) og hvort tafarlaus stöðvun mRNA-bólusetninga sé nauðsynleg í ljósi gagna um skaða (Fylgiskjal, kafli 2).

 

Lokaorð:

Gögn benda til óhæfilegs skaða af bólusetningaráætlun 2020–2023, ásamt alvarlegum skorti á gagnsæi og ábyrgð (Fylgiskjal, kaflar 2, 3). Alþjóðlegt samhengi, þ.m.t. leynd á gögnum lyfjafyrirtækja og gallaðar rannsóknir undir DoD/DARPA eftirliti, varpar ljósi á alvarleika málsins (Fylgiskjal, kafli 1). Ég óska eftir rannsókn á ábyrgð íslenskra stjórnvalda, með áherslu á möguleg brot á lögum nr. 74/1997, 93/1994 og alþjóðlegum siðferðisreglum, til að tryggja réttlæti og traust almennings til stjórnvalda.

 

Virðingarfyllst,

 

sign 

Guðmundur Karl Snæbjörnsson læknir

f.h. World Council for Health Iceland

x: @KalliSnae Fb: Kalli Snæ

Blog: kallinae.blog.is
 

Fylgiskjal: Samantekt um sóttvarnaaðgerðir og Covid-19 bólusetningar á Íslandi 2020–2023, brengluð vísindi og tengd álitamál

 

Afrit sent:

Velferðarnefnd Alþingis

Formenn stjórnmálaflokka

Mannréttindastofnun Íslands

Umboðsmaður barna

Fjölmiðlar Íslandi

 

Afrit viðbótarerindis og fylgiskjals á ensku:

World Council for Health

Independent Medical Alliance (áður FLCCC)

North Group

Mannréttindadómstóll Evrópu

Childrens Health Defense

 

 

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Fylgiskjal:

Mál nr. 181/2025

 

Samantekt um sóttvarnaaðgerðir og Covid-19 bólusetningar á Íslandi 2020–2023

 

Sóttvarnalög 2020–2023, brengluð vísindi og tengd álitamál

Þessi samantekt leitast við að greina heildarmynd sóttvarnaaðgerða á Íslandi og alþjóðlega á árunum 2020–2023, flokkað í pólitíska, læknisfræðilega, lagalega, siðferðilega/heimspekilega og áhrif fjölmiðlanna til stuðnings opinberum aðgerðum stjórnvalda, með áherslu á vísindalegan grundvöll, gagnsæi og siðferðileg sjónarmið.

 

1. Pólitískt ákvörðunarferli

Meginpunktar:

  • Sóttvarnalög (nr. 19/1997, breytingar nr. 99/2020, 100/2020) heimiluðu takmarkanir, þ.m.t. fjarlægðarmörk, einangrun, maskanotkun, ferðatakmarkanir og lokanir, en vísindalegur grundvöllur var takmarkaður, oft byggður á líkönum og óskhyggju frekar en staðfestum rannsóknum, t.d. vegna ófullnægjandi gagna um virkni maskanotkunar (Jefferson et al. 2023), fjarlægðarmarka (Ioannidis 2020), einangrunar (Allen et al. 2022; Nussbaumer-Streit et al. 2020), ferðatakmarkana (Burns et al. 2021) og lokana (Herby et al. 2022; Chin et al. 2021).
  • RT-PCR próf (Ct 35-40, 97,4–99,9% falskt jákvæð) voru óáreiðanleg, sem voru látnar réttmæta ólögmæta sóttkví (Robert Koch Institute 2020; WHO 2021).
  • Almannavarnir ýktu COVID-19 hættu, höfnuðu gagnrýnum sjónarmiðum (Snæbjörnsson 2025a; Desmet 2022).
  • HHS/Pfizer leynd: Pfizer gögn sýna Process 2 mRNA-bóluefni skorti vernd, olli ónæmisbælingu, >1.223 dauðsföllum (des. 2020–feb. 2021) og var notað án neyðarleyfis (Pfizer Inc. 2021). HHS/Pfizer reyndu 75 ára leynd, en Pittman alríkisdómari (6. jan. 2022) skipaði birtingu (PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • DoD/DARPA og lyfjafyrirtæki: DARPA stýrði mRNA-þróun frá 2011 (ADEPT, P3), með Pfizer/Moderna sem undirverktaka undir OTA-samningum (STAT News 2020; Schoeni 2023). Jackson-málið (United States v. Ventavia Research Grp., 2023) staðfestir DoD/DARPA ábyrgð, en Pfizer var undirverktaki án FDA-reglna (UncoverDC 2022; NTD 2023). Truncale dómari vísaði málinu frá (9. ágúst 2024), á þeim grundvelli að DoD, ekki Pfizer, var ábyrgðaraðili (Children’s Health Defense 2024). Operation Warp Speed (OWS) tryggði hraða markaðssetningu (The Washington Post 2020).
  • Umframdauðsföll (30,5% 2022, 6-Sigma) útiloka náttúrulegar orsakir (Hagstofa Íslands 2025).

Hagsmunaárekstrar:

  • Pfizer/Moderna græddu milljarða (Hammond et al. 2024).
  • DoD/DARPA samningar studdu hernaðarlega hagsmuni (STAT News 2020).

Niðurstaða: Pólitískar ákvarðanir, studdar DoD/DARPA, byggðust á óáreiðanlegum RT-PCR prófum og leynigögnum, benda til ásetningsbrots.

 

2. Læknisfræðilegar ákvarðanir og vísindaleg heilindi

Meginpunktar:

  • PCR próf: Óáreiðanleg RT-PCR próf (Ct 35-40) ýktu smittölur, studd Robert Koch Institute (2020) og réttlættu ólögmæta sóttkví (WHO 2021; Borger et al. 2021).
  • mRNA-bóluefni: Process 2 (E. coli-byggt, SV40 promoter) var notað án leyfis, brýtur gegn lögum nr. 93/1994 um lyf (McKernan et al. 2023). Pfizer gögn sýna >1.223 dauðsföll, 80% fósturlát, ónæmisbælingu, auknar sýkingar (Pfizer Inc. 2021; Cleveland Clinic 2022). Aukaverkanir fela í sér hjartaáföll (+20,22%) (Hagstofa Íslands 2025).
  • Ungbarnadauði á Íslandi 2021: 83,9% aukning í heildardauðsföllum frá 28 vikum meðgöngu til 28 daga eftir fæðingu miðað við 2015–2019 meðaltal (3,1 á 1.000; 2020: 3,1 á 1.000; 2021: 5,7 á 1.000, 28 tilfelli), hæsta hlutfall síðan 1988 (Hagstofa Íslands 2021). Tímasetningin fellur saman við bólusetningu þungaðra kvenna (vor–sumar 2021), en Hagstofan gefur ekki beina orsakatengingu og gögn leyfa ekki sundurliðun eftir þjóðerni (21% fædd af konum með erlent ríkisfang 2021). Frekari rannsókn er nauðsynleg til að staðfesta hugsanlegar tengingar við mRNA-bóluefni.
  • Fæðingar á Íslandi 2021–2023: 15,0% lækkun í lifandi fæðingum frá 2021 (4.879) til 2023 (4.146) (Hagstofa Íslands 2024).
  • Fæðingar í Tékklandi 2023: 66% lækkun hjá bólusettum konum 18–39 ára (óbolusettar: 114 á 1.000; bólusettar: 42 á 1.000, odds ratio 0,34), óvenjuleg lækkun (SMIS 2024; Rates of Successful Conceptions 2025). Tímasetning tengist getnaði 2022, þegar 68% kvenna voru bólusettar.
  • Frjósemi á Íslandi: Lækkaði úr 2,1 (2012) í 1,59 (2025), 24% lækkun, bendir til fólksfækkunar (Hagstofa Íslands 2025).
  • Rannsóknir: McKernan et al. (2025) benda til að TENT5A enduradenýlering í mRNA-bóluefnum geti haft áhrif á fósturþroska. Iwasaki et al. (2025) greina gaddaprótein í líkama bólusettra í yfir 700 daga, benda til langtímaáhrifa á frjósemi.
  • Remdesivir: 53% dánartíðni (Mulangu et al. 2019). Notað á Landspítala þrátt fyrir skort á virkni og mikils skaðleika (WHO 2020).
  • DoD/DARPA eftirlit: DARPA þróaði mRNA-tækni (ADEPT 2011, P3 2016), með Pfizer/Moderna sem undirverktaka án fullnægjandi öryggisrannsókna (STAT News 2020). Jackson-málið sýnir gallaðar rannsóknir, undanþegnar FDA-reglum, með DoD ábyrgð (NTD 2023; BMJ 2021; Children’s Health Defense 2024).
  • Umframdauði: 519 dauðsföll 2022 (30,5%, 6-Sigma), 2.000 yfir 2020–2023 (Hagstofa Íslands 2025).

Vísindaleg heilindi:

  • Rannsóknir á Process 2 voru ófullnægjandi og án neyðarleyfis, þótt Process 1 hafi fengið slíkt leyfi en var ekki notað í bólusetningum; lyfleysuhópurinn var eytt, sem takmarkaði öryggismat (Pfizer Inc. 2020; Guetzkow 2022; PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • VAERS skráði yfir 1 milljón aukaverkana og umframdauðsföll á Íslandi (30,5% 2022, 6-Sigma) benda til alvarlegs skaða (icandecide.org 2021; Hagstofa Íslands 2025).

Niðurstaða: Læknisfræðilegar ákvarðanir, undir DoD/DARPA eftirliti, byggðust á gölluðum vísindum, studdar 83,9% aukningu í ungbarnadauða og 15,0% lækkun í fæðingum, kalla á frekari rannsókn.

3. Mannréttindi og lagaleg sjónarmið

Meginpunktar:

  • Íslensk lög: Process 2 brýtur gegn lögum nr. 93/1994 um lyf. Skortur á upplýstu samþykki brýtur gegn lögum nr. 74/1997 um réttindi sjúklinga. Synjun á aðgangi að gögnum brýtur gegn lögum nr. 140/2012 um upplýsingarétt. Takmarkanir á ferðafrelsi, lokanir, einangrun og leynd brjóta gegn stjórnarskrá (greinar 67, 71, 65, 73, 75).
  • Alþjóðasamningar: Brot á Helsinki-yfirlýsingunni (1964, endurskoðuð 2013), greinum 5, 6, 8, sem krefjast upplýsts samþykkis, gagnsæis og lágmörkunar áhættu í læknisfræðilegum rannsóknum (WMA 2013). mRNA-bóluefni, notuð án fullnægjandi öryggisgagna og undir leynilegum OTA-samningum, brjóta gegn þessu. Brot á Nürnberg-reglum (IMT 1945), reglu 1 (sjálfviljugt samþykki) og reglu 7 (forðast óþarfa áhættu), vegna skorts á gagnsæi og ófullnægjandi rannsókna. Brot á Mannréttindasáttmála Evrópu (ECHR) (greinar 2, 5, 8, 10) og Alþjóðasamningi um borgaraleg og stjórnmálaleg réttindi (ICCPR) (greinar 6, 7, 9) varðandi rétt til lífs, frelsis og bann við læknisfræðilegum tilraunum án samþykkis.
  • HHS/Pfizer leynd: 75 ára leyndarbeiðni brýtur gegn Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (1967) (PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • DoD/DARPA og Jackson-málið: OTA-samningar undanþágu Pfizer frá FDA-reglum, hindruðu gagnsæi og komu í veg fyrir upplýst samþykki (UncoverDC 2022; NTD 2023). Truncale dómari (2024) staðfesti DoD ábyrgð, brýtur gegn Helsinki-yfirlýsingunni og Nürnberg-reglum (Children’s Health Defense 2024).

Niðurstaða: Aðgerðir, studdar DoD/DARPA, brutu gegn íslenskum lögum, Helsinki-yfirlýsingunni, Nürnberg-reglum og alþjóðasamningum vegna skorts á upplýstu samþykki, gagnsæi og lögmæti, kalla á frekari skoðun.

 

4. Áhrif fjölmiðla og ritskoðun

Meginpunktar:

  • Fjölmiðlar ýktu ótta, jaðarsettu efasemdarmenn og studdu einhliða frásagnir stjórnvalda (Snæbjörnsson 2025a; Desmet 2022).
  • Synjun heilbrigðisstofnunar [Embætti Landlæknis] á aðgangi að gögnum (janúar 2024) brýtur gegn lögum nr. 140/2012 um upplýsingarétt.
  • Fjölmiðlar þögguðu niður DoD/DARPA hlutverki (X færslur 2024).

Niðurstaða: Fjölmiðlar hindruðu gagnsæi með einhliða umfjöllun og stuðningi við opinberar aðgerðir, kalla á skoðun á áhrifum þeirra á almenningsálitið.

 

5. Siðferðileg og heimspekileg sjónarmið

Meginpunktar:

  • Ásetningur: Vísbendingar benda til ásetningsbrots („democide“), studdar Pfizer gögnum, 75 ára leynd, DoD/DARPA ábyrgð, 83,9% aukningu í ungbarnadauða, 15,0% lækkun í íslenskum fæðingum, 66% lækkun hjá bólusettum konum í Tékklandi og 6-Sigma skaða (Pfizer Inc. 2021; PHMPT v. FDA 2022; OSAPG 1948).
  • Siðfræði: Notkun Process 2 án upplýsts samþykkis, undir DoD/DARPA eftirliti, brýtur gegn Helsinki-yfirlýsingunni (grein 8, lágmörkun áhættu) og Nürnberg-reglum (regla 1, sjálfviljugt samþykki) (WMA 2013; IMT 1945).
  • Heimspeki: Hópmyndun, eins og lýst er í kenningu Desmet um hópmyndunarvitfirring (2022), ýtti undir ótta og samþykki aðgerða vegna einhliða frásagna og félagslegs þrýstings, studd sálfræðikenningum Jung (1964) og Arendt (1951) um hóphegðun í kreppum.

Niðurstaða: Siðferðileg brot, studd hernaðareftirliti og hópmyndun, gerðu skaða mögulegan, kalla á siðferðilega skoðun.

 

6. Heildarniðurstaða

Meginpunktar:

  • Sóttvarnaaðgerðir 2020–2023 byggðust að verulegu leyti á brengluðum vísindum og takmarkaðri vísindalegri stoð.
  • Óáreiðanleg RT-PCR próf (Ct 35-40, 97,4–99,9% falskt jákvæð) voru notuð til að réttlæta ólögmæta sóttkví (Robert Koch Institute 2020; WHO 2021). Takmarkanir, þ.m.t. fjarlægðarmörk, einangrun, maskanotkun, ferðatakmarkanir og lokanir, höfðu takmarkaðan vísindalegan grundvöll, oft byggðan á líkönum og óskhyggju frekar en staðfestum rannsóknum (Jefferson et al. 2023; Ioannidis 2020; Allen et al. 2022; Burns et al. 2021; Herby et al. 2022; Nussbaumer-Streit et al. 2020; Chin et al. 2021).
  • Pfizer gögn, upphaflega leynileg í 75 ár, sýna að Process 2 mRNA-bóluefni skorti vernd, olli ónæmisbælingu og leiddi til >1.223 dauðsfalla (des. 2020–feb. 2021), en Pittman dómari skipaði birtingu (PHMPT v. FDA 2022).
  • Brook Jackson-málið staðfestir DoD/DARPA ábyrgð á mRNA-þróun, með Pfizer sem undirverktaka (United States v. Ventavia Research Grp., 2023; NTD 2023). Truncale dómari vísaði málinu frá (9. ágúst 2024), staðfestir DoD ábyrgð (Children’s Health Defense 2024).
  • Ungbarnadauði á Íslandi 2021 jókst um 83,9% (úr 3,1 í 5,7 á 1.000) og fæðingar lækkuðu um 15,0% 2021–2023 (Hagstofa Íslands 2024).
  • Fæðingar hjá bólusettum konum í Tékklandi 2023 lækkuðu um 66% (SMIS 2024).
  • Frjósemi á Íslandi lækkaði um 24% (úr 2,1 í 1,59, 2012–2025), bendir til fólksfækkunar (Hagstofa Íslands 2025).
  • McKernan et al. (2025) og Iwasaki et al. (2025) benda til líffræðilegra áhrifa mRNA-bóluefna á fósturþroska og frjósemi.
  • Umframdauði (30,5% 2022, 6-Sigma) tengist bóluefnum (Hagstofa Íslands 2025).
  • Aðgerðir brutu íslensk lög (stjórnarskrá, lög nr. 93/1994, 74/1997), Helsinki-yfirlýsinguna (upplýst samþykki, gagnsæi), Nürnberg-reglur (sjálfviljugt samþykki) og alþjóðasamninga (ECHR, ICCPR).
  • Fjölmiðlar leyndu DoD/DARPA hlutverki.
  • Hópmyndun ýtti undir ótta í samfélaginu (Desmet 2022).
  • Vísbendingar um ásetningsbrot („democide“) eru studdar leynd, skaða og hernaðarlegum hagsmunum.

 

Kröfur:

  • Óháð rannsókn á ábyrgð DoD/DARPA, Process 2, umframdauða, ungbarnadauða, fæðingarlækkun og líffræðilegum áhrifum mRNA-bóluefna.
  • Skoðun á mögulegri kæru til Mannréttindadómstóls Evrópu (ECHR) og Sameinuðu þjóðanna (SÞ).
  • Birting gagna um DARPA samninga og aukaverkanir.
  • Nauðsyn þess að stöðva frekari mRNA-bólusetningar.

 

Heimildalisti

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  • Desmet, Mattias. 2022. The Psychology of Totalitarianism. Gretna, LA: Pelican Publishing.
  • Hammond, Jennifer, et al. 2024. „Nirmatrelvir fyrir bólusetta og óbólusetta sjúklinga með COVID-19.“ New England Journal of Medicine 390 (13): 1186–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2309003
  • Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN). 2021. „Greining á VAERS gögnum eftir mRNA-bólusetningu: Aukaverkanir og dánartíðni.“ https://icandecide.org/reports/
  • International Military Tribunal (IMT). 1945. „Nürnberg-reglur.“ Í Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, 2:181–82. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Ioannidis, John P.A. 2020. „Alþjóðlegt yfirlit yfir faraldsfræði COVID-19 yfir heilt hringrásarfaraldur.“ European Journal of Clinical Investigation 50 (12): e13423. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13423
  • Jefferson, Tom, et al. 2023. „Líkamlegar inngripsaðgerðir til að stöðva eða draga úr útbreiðslu öndunarfæraveira.“ Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023 (1): CD006207. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6
  • Jung, Carl Gustav. 1964. Man and His Symbols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • McKernan, Kevin J., et al. 2023. „Raðgreining á tvívirkum Moderna og Pfizer mRNA-bóluefnum sýnir nanógramma til míkrógramma magn af tjáningarvektor-DNA á skammt.“ OSF Preprints, 10. apríl. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bntzam
  • Mulangu, Sabue, et al. 2019. „Slembivalin, stýrð rannsókn á meðferðum við Ebóluveirusjúkdómi.“ New England Journal of Medicine 381 (24): 2293–303. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993
  • Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara, et al. 2020. „Sóttkví ein og sér eða ásamt öðrum lýðheilsuaðgerðum til að stjórna COVID-19: Hröð yfirlit.“ Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020 (4): CD013574. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013574
  • SMIS (Association of Microbiologists, Immunologists, and Statistics). 2024. „Lækkun fæðingartíðni: Leiðrétting á villum forsætisráðherra Tékklands.“ 31. október.

 


Gefa einkunina 1Gefa einkunina 2Gefa einkunina 3Gefa einkunina 4Gefa einkunina 5 Vísindi og fræði | Breytt s.d. kl. 08:49 | Slóð | | Athugasemdir (0)

Bloggfærslur 6. maí 2025

Innskráning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveikið á Javascript til að hefja innskráningu.

Hafðu samband